My fiancé has a live mouse trap called “The Mouse Hotel”.
Every winter, mice start to show up in our house as it gets cold outside. He
places his trap out at night, and in the morning, there will be a mouse in it
which he will then drop off in a field on his way to work. He by no means advocated
that mice shouldn’t be killed or anything like that, but in his case, he just
says it takes no extra effort and if he doesn’t need to kill them, why would he.
This scenario got me thinking about some of the interactions
going on that contribute to his and my ecological identity. Firstly, though our
actions are not killing the mouse, we are removing it from one environment and
putting it into another. This not only affects the mouse, but if we place
enough mice into the new environment it can also influence that ecosystem, both
positive or negative.
It also got me thinking about why the mouse is there to
begin with. I think the first inclination is to say that I have mice getting
into MY home, but really who is in who’s home? The house I am in was built 20
years ago in 1998. Before that, it was probably a wooded or fielded area where
mice were abundant. With this consideration, didn’t I (or whomever built the
house) move into the home of the mice first? Really, if was human influences
that changed the ecosystem of the mice and when they come into my home, they
are simply adapting to their environment.
Obviously, I am not going to move out of my house and give
it back to the mice, but it is an interesting consideration and part of my
identity. How many countless other animals might have been displaced or force
to adapt due to new construction of neighborhoods?
No comments:
Post a Comment